Cash Positive Financing is how we upgrade clients to green energy technology. The monthly energy and maintenance savings are greater than the monthly repayment cost. This means clients are cash flow positive the moment equipment is installed.
No capital improvement budget is needed. No cash outlays are required. No settling for the cheapest equipment. No partial upgrades. We fund the upfront cost of superior technologies saving up to 80% in energy and maintenance expenses.
Do smaller class sizes improve academic performance? The answer is a resounding yes. Our common sense tells us more teacher attention per pupil results in a more engaged student. Numerous studies validate this point (https://www.classsizematters.org/research-and-links/). The landmark Tennessee Star Study (see chart) is the most conclusive evidence smaller class sizes is in our national interest. It proved when students are in class sizes between 13 and 17 students they are more accountable to learn and behave. However, budget realities make the cost of reducing class sizes unaffordable. Most school districts are so constrained financially they cannot afford to increase pay for even their best teachers.
There is no magic bullet to fixing public schools, but our unique solution will help. We fund the upfront cost for an entire school district’s green energy transformation. The term length is set to ensure positive cash flows the moment installation is completed. We are reimbursed only from energy savings. At the end of term, they keep 100% of the savings.
By funding conversions to smart LED lighting systems, cloud-based HVAC solutions, and other green energy technologies We can produce total electric utility savings of 60 – 80%. This is how every school district can afford to hire more teachers and/or increase pay..
To apply our solution, let’s look at a high level example using data published by my local public school district. The starting base salary for new teachers is $46,000, and their most recent annual electrical utility cost is $5,600,000. Using our method, they spend $0 to become a district-wide, sustainable energy campus. With a 70% total reduction in utility cost, the district now has $3,900,000 in cash savings of which $3,312,000 is spent on reimbursement payments. They enjoy an immediate cash flow increase of $588,000 annually which pays for 12 new teachers during the contract period. At the conclusion of the term, the remaining savings of $3,312,000 annually is theirs. This example allows them to hire a whopping 72 additional teachers for a total of 84 new teachers!
We can shrink class sizes by adding more teachers. There are no bond referendums. There are no tax increases. There are no upfront costs. There is no discrimination against poorer districts. Help us improve student performance via smaller class sizes while doing what’s right for our planet!
The K-12 sector alone spends $6 billion annually in the U.S. on energy bills, more than textbooks and computers combined, and second only to teacher salaries. Reducing energy usage by 20 percent across the education sector would result in energy cost savings of more than $3.3 billion that K-12 schools, colleges, and universities can better spend on educating students. Zero energy design and construction provides an opportunity to decrease spending on operations and maintenance of facilities, which can provide savings for reinvestment in the classroom. Thanks to the incorporation of energy performance goals into deep retrofit and new construction projects, K-12 schools have seen a rapid rise in the adoption of zero energy design. One of the benefits school districts across the nation have also seen are that the technologies featured in these advanced buildings provide students first-hand exposure to energy efficiency in the classroom and basically serve as a natural conduit to making science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) lesson plans more engaging.
Copyright © 2018 Alternative Lighting and Power - All Rights Reserved.